Welcome to the cannabis growing issues and help section. Use this section to ask about issues, deficiencies and other problems you encounter while growing cannabis. To become part of our online cannabis growing community click here to register.
Flushing
- Mafooo
- Registered User
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2020 4:32 am
- Location: MafoooFarms on Instagram
- Has thanked: 1020 times
- Been thanked: 1049 times
- Status: Offline
Re: Flushing
I think the idea of the flush is even if you cant “sense” a difference in quality there is a less likelihood of you ingesting raw nutes, ferts, salts, or heavy metals that are remnant particles within the plants veins and cells
- These users thanked the author Mafooo for the post (total 2):
- 2-Scoops (Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:56 pm) • Spartangrown (Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:12 am)
- The Aspie Toker
- GR420 Leg End
- Posts: 14730
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:45 pm
- Location: Your mother's bedroom.
- Has thanked: 5848 times
- Been thanked: 3412 times
- Status: Offline
Re: Flushing
Mt first grow was in coir. I never flushed. Tasted really nice and a smooth smoke.Donkey222 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:55 pmhttps://www.rxgreentechnologies.com/rxg ... ing-trial/
I saw something on here about flushing and it got me thinking as I know over the years I've definitely cut 1 or 2 without a flush and cant say I've noticed any difference , after a bit of nonsense reading I came across an actual study that I thought was interesting
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
- These users thanked the author The Aspie Toker for the post:
- Joker59 (Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:03 pm)
Never give advice. Wise men don't need advice. Fools won't take it.
- GMO
- Registered User
- Posts: 10500
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 2:44 pm
- Has thanked: 4546 times
- Been thanked: 3136 times
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Re: Flushing
video interview. may help people understand the data more clearly :D
“If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.” -Albert Einstein
- Spartangrown
- Registered User
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 11:11 pm
- Has thanked: 66 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
- Status: Offline
Re: Flushing
I just want to drop my simple, common sense, answer to why it's probably just a good idea at least, feed just water for that last few weeks of the plants life.
The argument is that the final product either is or isn't better if flushed right? Nobody is really saying the non-flushed bud is better, they are usually saying they couldn't tell a difference (so it's As good, but not better than flushed). Even if we take that statement as fact, that, non-flushed bud is as good as flushed bud, that is still a reason to flush.
By simply feeding only water for two weeks (what we are calling flushing here), we do not loose quality (if they are both as good as the other), but we DO, SAVE MONEY by not adding any product at the end. Why continue feeding and using up things that cost money when you can get the same (I actually believe better) results without the feed?
I personally don't do a large volume flush of water but I do just plain water feeds at the end of the plants life. I am 100% convinced it produces a higher quality end product. I theorize that plain water (no nutrient) "feeds" cause a stress response in the plant to speed up the finishing up process and I swear I see more trichomes too.
#growerslove
The argument is that the final product either is or isn't better if flushed right? Nobody is really saying the non-flushed bud is better, they are usually saying they couldn't tell a difference (so it's As good, but not better than flushed). Even if we take that statement as fact, that, non-flushed bud is as good as flushed bud, that is still a reason to flush.
By simply feeding only water for two weeks (what we are calling flushing here), we do not loose quality (if they are both as good as the other), but we DO, SAVE MONEY by not adding any product at the end. Why continue feeding and using up things that cost money when you can get the same (I actually believe better) results without the feed?
I personally don't do a large volume flush of water but I do just plain water feeds at the end of the plants life. I am 100% convinced it produces a higher quality end product. I theorize that plain water (no nutrient) "feeds" cause a stress response in the plant to speed up the finishing up process and I swear I see more trichomes too.
#growerslove
- These users thanked the author Spartangrown for the post (total 3):
- Joker59 (Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:16 am) • Elijah Growz (Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:28 am) • GMO (Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:31 am)
- Joker59
- Registered User
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:56 am
- Location: In my fucking garden where I should be
- Has thanked: 313 times
- Been thanked: 377 times
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Re: Flushing
I 100% agree that using just water for the last 1-2 weeks (depending on growth rate for me) is smart for the reasons you mentioned and I also find it stresses the plant a bit and increases some tric production.Spartangrown wrote: ↑Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:10 amI just want to drop my simple, common sense, answer to why it's probably just a good idea at least, feed just water for that last few weeks of the plants life.
The argument is that the final product either is or isn't better if flushed right? Nobody is really saying the non-flushed bud is better, they are usually saying they couldn't tell a difference (so it's As good, but not better than flushed). Even if we take that statement as fact, that, non-flushed bud is as good as flushed bud, that is still a reason to flush.
By simply feeding only water for two weeks (what we are calling flushing here), we do not loose quality (if they are both as good as the other), but we DO, SAVE MONEY by not adding any product at the end. Why continue feeding and using up things that cost money when you can get the same (I actually believe better) results without the feed?
I personally don't do a large volume flush of water but I do just plain water feeds at the end of the plants life. I am 100% convinced it produces a higher quality end product. I theorize that plain water (no nutrient) "feeds" cause a stress response in the plant to speed up the finishing up process and I swear I see more trichomes too.
#growerslove
I think it’s the large volume flushes and and people over feeding there plants under the assumption they can force feed them water and have it remove all the chems that bugs me. I seem to meet a lot of people that think they can literally flush all the bad out by watering with 5 times the water for 10 days lol
- These users thanked the author Joker59 for the post (total 3):
- Elijah Growz (Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:38 am) • GMO (Sun Jun 21, 2020 10:42 am) • Spartangrown (Sun Jun 21, 2020 4:55 pm)
Just a Canadian Cannabis enthusiast If you aren’t learning then what’s the point!?
“You may be Galileo, but your probably just wrong! “
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it“ Evelyn Beatrice Hall.
viewtopic.php?f=88&t=6271 Purple Orange (CBD+), CBDurban, Gorilla Zkittles, And more!! IG@thekidchronnabis
“You may be Galileo, but your probably just wrong! “
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it“ Evelyn Beatrice Hall.
viewtopic.php?f=88&t=6271 Purple Orange (CBD+), CBDurban, Gorilla Zkittles, And more!! IG@thekidchronnabis
- Spartangrown
- Registered User
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 11:11 pm
- Has thanked: 66 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
- Status: Offline
Re: Flushing
Well said, I agree with you, the high volume flushes just seem like a waste of water to me.Thejokerjosh59 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:24 am
I 100% agree that using just water for the last 1-2 weeks (depending on growth rate for me) is smart for the reasons you mentioned and I also find it stresses the plant a bit and increases some tric production.
I think it’s the large volume flushes and and people over feeding there plants under the assumption they can force feed them water and have it remove all the chems that bugs me. I seem to meet a lot of people that think they can literally flush all the bad out by watering with 5 times the water for 10 days lol
- These users thanked the author Spartangrown for the post:
- Joker59 (Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:20 pm)
- Joker59
- Registered User
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2020 8:56 am
- Location: In my fucking garden where I should be
- Has thanked: 313 times
- Been thanked: 377 times
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Re: Flushing
Spartangrown wrote: ↑Sun Jun 21, 2020 4:55 pmWell said, I agree with you, the high volume flushes just seem like a waste of water to me.Thejokerjosh59 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:24 am
I 100% agree that using just water for the last 1-2 weeks (depending on growth rate for me) is smart for the reasons you mentioned and I also find it stresses the plant a bit and increases some tric production.
I think it’s the large volume flushes and and people over feeding there plants under the assumption they can force feed them water and have it remove all the chems that bugs me. I seem to meet a lot of people that think they can literally flush all the bad out by watering with 5 times the water for 10 days lol
Not to mention the fact that all that extra water is just asking for bud problems if your not careful with the rh
- These users thanked the author Joker59 for the post:
- Spartangrown (Sun Jun 21, 2020 5:41 pm)