Hi again Dex,
Dex wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:18 pm
Hey ezgoset I like reading your stuff but not when stoned...
Well, do us all a favour because there's something i don't like myself and it's about how i write my alias: the name is
Egzoset with a capital "E" or just don't use it at all if you can't write it correctly, quite especially if you're already acquianted through past readings, so please lets avoid such risk to inspire even a likelihood of provocation... In any case if it's hard to read imagine about having to wright it. Honestly sometimes i grow tired of the "social" routine, i'd rather skip that part.
Dex wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:18 pm
Or clone off the same plant?
If i were to clone i'd favour micro-propagation instead.
Dex wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 9:18 pm
Hope you have a lovely day/noon too buddy
Well, at times i puff a lot so lets say i'm over-reacting and you're actually a friendy guy, then i may want to invest into a better explanation about how CS can be generated at home. It will help if you can read some electronics schematic, if not that will allow me to focus anyway. For example:
Ah yes, 1st i remember there's a problem with using 3 batteries of 9 Volts each connected in series (e.g. 27 Volts total) and nothing else:
This hypothetical model was close enough @ 24 Volts. The story it relates is that of uncontrolled electrolysis, too slow initially then accelerating toward a short-circuit condition... Its main problem would be that the electrolysis rate affects silver particle size which itself determines penetration of biological cells. Lack of control from a cheap 3 batteries only setup typically results in inferior CS because stronger current takes larger chunks (instead of just ions), especially once distilled water has become a conductor. The preceeding schematic suggests how to correct such defect by setting a proper 1 mA current per "donor" surface (20 $ coin), which invites a higher voltage design (of 60 Volts in that case). The output is controlled in 2 ways: #1) its polarity gets reversed repeatedly to tame down the accumulation of silver goo on electrode surfaces; #2) the polarity reversal period can be optimized so that potential silver deposits apparently fall inbetween the 2 electrodes, which depends on distance vs donor surface.
That's it. The expected effects were miticide @ 1 ~ 3 ppm and ethylene hormone suppression above 10, maybe 20 or 25 ppm (if i'm not mistaking). Which is why 45 sounded a bit odd, but i must also confess the experiment was cancelled for a lack of interest and an excess of anthropomorphic jokes, etc. So in the end my 2 plants were eaten by spidermites without ever attempting to interrupt their reproduction cycle (via eggs destruction by silver ions), much less produce pollen to fertilize another autofem (one with female calixes instead)... At least dealing with The Borg i could have a fair taste 1st-hand about how it feels when "resistance is futile"!
Good day, have fun!!