aye bach 1.50 a day is my diminishing returns so what i mean is the point where the dope gets to much light is in yuh pocket


aye bach 1.50 a day is my diminishing returns so what i mean is the point where the dope gets to much light is in yuh pocket
aye but i can usually get a pound ruffly !!! for £10 quid a week running cost im happy with that bach,and mr swalec aint gonna bother me his heNanook of the north wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:07 pmAhhhhh, you mean you rate it on cost per day. But this is irreverent as well capt as you could pay £3 a day, get twice as much and only grow half the year.
well it grows in the wild in africa under full sun + temps of 45 degrees .......so yeah its a job to know but surely the sun is the brightest ?Bulls wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:11 pmWell, you got a point, but it's kind of a different subject. What I'd like to discuss is what the actual maximum light a plant can absorb and when it is an overkill.
It's closely related to what you're saying too as if we get this right a lot of people will be saving lots of money and not wasting energy ans pollution.
ive run 1kw in the past in a 10 x 10 nanook nft 3 trays in the rite conditions white painted floor ...walls...ceiling ewe be surprised mun in my chamber ive only got it @ 400 watts hid i relly cant run it a 600 as i get hot spot in the middle see,lights a big player but if the dope is healthy is more what ewe after imo,anyway like i say its cost related here i dont like wasting money where its not needed.